|
101011
|
 |
« on: August 23, 2008, 06:25:40 PM » |
|
While listening to this I happened to hear what almost sounded like an EVP...but I couldn't tell if it was a sound effect or EVP. Can you confirm this Cimm if it was a sound effect? The time that it happens is 30:49.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cimmerian
Administrator
Ranter Level 4
   
Karma: 58
Posts: 365
Don't hate the media, become the media.
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2008, 08:39:21 PM » |
|
I had to look up EVP... "Electronic voice phenomenon". Sometimes due to the vocal effects I put on Sean's voice it'll create some weird sounds. I guess you're talking about the effect when he says "Usually they'll [noise] pass sentence right there on the spot." That would be a EVP for sure, I listened to the original recording of Sean without effects and the noise is there as well. I can't tell what the hell the noise is, it kind of sounds like breathing but it isn't. Hope that helps! While listening to this I happened to hear what almost sounded like an EVP...but I couldn't tell if it was a sound effect or EVP. Can you confirm this Cimm if it was a sound effect? The time that it happens is 30:49.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
101011
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2008, 10:52:16 PM » |
|
Thank you, that does help! Is it possible to get the unedited version of that same clip that you listened too? About 10 seconds before and afterwards of it? I'd like to post it on another website that I run that is involved with ghost hunting. Plenty of people have disregarded any validity of such things occurring during simple recordings. I'll post credit and link back to the TFTA section to drive more traffic that way.
I'd be curious to get more information on the approximate time and location that Sean was recording from...if any events happened in the area, or to him or his family around that time frame. If it's possible, what kind of equipment might have been used during that recording?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HerbertFilby
Ranter Level 2

Karma: 7
Posts: 45
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2008, 11:39:37 PM » |
|
That's not the only occurance. I don't know yet what it is, but I also see the same phenomenon at 20:59 right before he says: "On the fringe out here, if you don't have weapons.... you're just a piece of meat" Speeding it up 33% makes it sound like someone exhaling.... Oh man I'm not going to sleep tonight haha. Edit: another one at 43:35 Here's my analysis in audacity.  This is the spectrum view in Audacity. It shows you the frequencies used rather than wav decibels, so it's pretty cool because you get an added dimension to the sound... The colors add in the loudness, where blue is quiet, red is louder and white is loudest... So the bits of white area are where Sean is speaking, and the heights of the red waves are frequencies associated with speech. So the red towards the top of the graph would represent parts of speech that have a high pitched sound, like "S" (phonetically: "ess" like a whistle). The whisper is very low in frequency, so you can do a low-pass filter to eliminate at least some of the noise, along with a hard limiter to eliminate the louder noise (ie decibels in Sean's speech), But this resulted in a flat line of low frequency-quiet noise, in which the whisper actually blended in, and I could not isolate it (ie. make it stand out and find every instance in the audio file). I'm no audio pro, but maybe that'll help someone with the right knowledge figure out what this is. As it is not altered with filters the same way Sean's voice is, so even if it was Sean breathing in or out after speaking, it isn't filtered the same way 
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 26, 2008, 12:08:31 AM by HerbertFilby »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fire_missionary
Ranter Level 3
 
Karma: 32
Posts: 182
Flamethrower for the masses.
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2008, 11:22:52 AM » |
|
Not to start a fight, but I've noticed on those ghost hunter shows they never have a true skeptic/scientifically oriented person in their team.
Sure they say they are a skeptic, because it gives a certain appeal. "Well their skeptic agreed it was EVP so it must have been!"
Meh.
I'll take a look at the files sometime when I get around to it.
Chances are it was a breath of wind or w/e that got messed up in the encoding. True skeptic here heh.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Spreading the Flame "A contradiction cannot exist in reality. Not in part, nor in whole." - Zeddicus Zu'l Zorander
|
|
|
|
101011
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2008, 01:03:26 PM » |
|
One thing that I've noticed in the paranormal world about some skeptics is that there is completely no room for the possibility of the paranormal. Just because something can be reproduced doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. I whole heartedly agree that it could be something completely else. One of the problems I think with EVP experiments is that there is no "lock and key" type questioning occurring, in other words a question that is asked by someone to someone who's passed that only knows the answer. Otherwise, the skeptics can usually tear it apart and explain it away into oblivion.
At the 20:59 mark, I personally think it's Sean exhaling.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fire_missionary
Ranter Level 3
 
Karma: 32
Posts: 182
Flamethrower for the masses.
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2008, 03:41:27 PM » |
|
Don't get me wrong. If there is evidence that disproves my views, I will take it in and re-evaluate my thoughts and ideas.
I'm not one of those 'set-in-stone' guys who you can't persuade with proper evidence.
I just don't trust a complete stranger who says God is everywhere, and take it as fact. I only use this as an example of what I mean.
I'm a logical man, simply stated.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Spreading the Flame "A contradiction cannot exist in reality. Not in part, nor in whole." - Zeddicus Zu'l Zorander
|
|
|
Yugosaki
Ranter Level 5
   
Karma: 80
Posts: 934
Professor Badass
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2008, 04:13:35 PM » |
|
Don't get me wrong. If there is evidence that disproves my views, I will take it in and re-evaluate my thoughts and ideas.
I'm not one of those 'set-in-stone' guys who you can't persuade with proper evidence.
I just don't trust a complete stranger who says God is everywhere, and take it as fact. I only use this as an example of what I mean.
I'm a logical man, simply stated.
I agree. While I will admit I do believe in much of the paranormal, I still try to take the most scientific attitude of "this is not concrete proof. therefore, not proven" because, everything otherwise it's not a fact, it's just a belief, and it's wrong to make people believe what you believe
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
second life: Yugosaki Coronet
Optimism- Ignoring the obvious Pessimism- Believing the world sucks and if the worst can happen, it will happen. Survivalism- realizing the universe is malevolent and doing everything in your power to thwart it's plans.
|
|
|
|
101011
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2008, 07:45:08 PM » |
|
I would have to ask the person who is skeptical, what is their criteria for certain events? My own criteria would be the "lock and key" scenario...someone asks a personal question only the post-mortem entity would know and that entity responds with an answer.
To to begin to understand, what criteria are people planning on using for their personal take on the EVP?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brokengret
Ranter Level 2

Karma: 1
Posts: 28
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2008, 09:04:54 PM » |
|
Just to throw my two cents in; I don't believe any thing can be accurately described as "supernatural". Paranormal, however, I can support. If a phenomena occurs that can not be explained by conventional science, that simply means we do not yet have a scientific explanation, not that we never will.
I do believe in many paranormal phenomena, but I'm not going to judge every bump in the night as a ghost or monster. As a Pagan, the paranormal is implemented on a regular basis, that doesn't mean others have to believe, I don't expect any one to, I'm just glad that people are capable of being open minded enough not to bash any one elses opinions.
Because the truth is, no one knows. Everything comes down to choice.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It is your responsibility alone, to choose what you believe.
|
|
|
fire_missionary
Ranter Level 3
 
Karma: 32
Posts: 182
Flamethrower for the masses.
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: August 27, 2008, 10:06:03 AM » |
|
Just to throw my two cents in; I don't believe any thing can be accurately described as "supernatural". Paranormal, however, I can support. If a phenomena occurs that can not be explained by conventional science, that simply means we do not yet have a scientific explanation, not that we never will.
I do believe in many paranormal phenomena, but I'm not going to judge every bump in the night as a ghost or monster. As a Pagan, the paranormal is implemented on a regular basis, that doesn't mean others have to believe, I don't expect any one to, I'm just glad that people are capable of being open minded enough not to bash any one elses opinions.
Because the truth is, no one knows. Everything comes down to choice.
Paranormal is defined as "not scientifically explainable" by Merriam Webster. Supernatrual is a bit more complex. 1: of or relating to an order of existence beyond the visible observable universe; especially : of or relating to God or a god, demigod, spirit, or devil 2 a: departing from what is usual or normal especially so as to appear to transcend the laws of nature b: attributed to an invisible agent (as a ghost or spirit) Not to say Merriam Webster is 100%. I'd think that something Supernatural is almost always Paranormal. You could lob your Gods, Miracles, Ghosts, all that crap in with Supernatural. All of it is also Paranormal, or at least most of it is when you have a predispositioned mindset towards it. The religious guy is going to see "heaven" when he has a near death experience. I'm going to have a really weird dream when I have a near death experience. (I know, I have done this.) Would I say it was X being's plan to make me see my dream? No. You cannot tell the guy who saw God in his NDE that it was jut an overactive brain going into *panic* mode being deprived of oxygen. He simply will not believe you. Fueling the fires of this discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Spreading the Flame "A contradiction cannot exist in reality. Not in part, nor in whole." - Zeddicus Zu'l Zorander
|
|
|
fire_missionary
Ranter Level 3
 
Karma: 32
Posts: 182
Flamethrower for the masses.
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: August 27, 2008, 10:13:04 AM » |
|
I would have to ask the person who is skeptical, what is their criteria for certain events? My own criteria would be the "lock and key" scenario...someone asks a personal question only the post-mortem entity would know and that entity responds with an answer.
To to begin to understand, what criteria are people planning on using for their personal take on the EVP?
The problems that you face when you ask a question like this. It just cannot be answered by any of the ways the 'ghost hunters' use. Ouija boards have a powerful group suggestibility power. Its exactly like using the pendulum to get answers from spirits. Its called the idiomotor response. If you COULD get an answer from the outside source (i.e. the sound recorded in the room) and its not one of those whisper things which sounds like X to person a and YYZ to person b, then i think you are on to something. Example of what I mean. Ghost R is in a room. Nobody knows how he died. You are able to capture responses from him on a tape recorder. You ask how he died and he responds with a fairly in-depth sentence or phrase. "my father choked me" (where it could possibly be construed to "my brother coked me") but you get the idea that it was a family member and it was their fault with purpose. I'd believe that if I was there at the time of the recording.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Spreading the Flame "A contradiction cannot exist in reality. Not in part, nor in whole." - Zeddicus Zu'l Zorander
|
|
|
|
101011
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2008, 11:32:53 AM » |
|
The problems that you face when you ask a question like this. It just cannot be answered by any of the ways the 'ghost hunters' use. Ouija boards have a powerful group suggestibility power. Its exactly like using the pendulum to get answers from spirits. Its called the idiomotor response.
I agree. The groups that use "paranormal" means to try to establish paranormal evidence are using circular logic. They're trying to prove the paranormal with the paranormal. That burns my ass every time I see other ghost hunting groups using such methods. Not to say Merriam Webster is 100%. I'd think that something Supernatural is almost always Paranormal. You could lob your Gods, Miracles, Ghosts, all that crap in with Supernatural. All of it is also Paranormal, or at least most of it is when you have a predispositioned mindset towards it. The religious guy is going to see "heaven" when he has a near death experience. I'm going to have a really weird dream when I have a near death experience. (I know, I have done this.) Would I say it was X being's plan to make me see my dream? No. You cannot tell the guy who saw God in his NDE that it was jut an overactive brain going into *panic* mode being deprived of oxygen. He simply will not believe you.
This is one thing that truly burns my ass too. Most of the debates I've gotten into with others about the possibility of something not being true, they'll debate it to the end. They tend to be Absolutists. Either they're called "true believers" or "skeptics." Now, I personally don't like the word "skeptic" because you have people like myself who are skeptical, but reasonable. But, last time I checked there wasn't a word for the Absolutist scale on the skeptics side. But, definitions in books aren't the "be all end all," it's important to establish definitions during a debate so communication is understood. If I had a strange vivid dream like experience during an NDE, I wouldn't stamp my foot in either direction in terms of belief. Is the possibility of it being paranormal there? Sure. Is the possibility of it being completely natural? Sure. But, there's always that little bit to sway back and forth. What if it's completely natural for the brain to go through such activity during NDE, which opens the flood gates for the paranormal experience? I've personally had experience with an EVP that I've explained before in a thread. Totally shocked and creeped me out because it was in my own house. So, when I hear another EVP, I'm skeptical...but the possibility of it being true is also there. Which is why I start asking questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|